Messages de Curlspezial - Page 201

• 

• Membre
• Age : 51 ans
• Messages : 4353
• Classement : Ex-16
• CD: Whale III 2.0
• RV: 979. 0x
• Bois: Gladiator

Jeudi 09 Octobre 2008 16:23

De mon côté, j'ai envoyé hier un mail à Odd Gustaven en lui demandant des explications claires sur le retrait de l'Insider et du SBIF. Je doute qu'il prenne le temps de me répondre, mais la moindre des choses, serait qu'un communiqué soit posté sur le site de l'ITTF pour donner les raisons qui ont amené la fédé a prendre une telle décision; voici mon email :

Good afternoon,

I am emailing you from France today regarding the new authorized rubbers list which is already available on the internet, on the spanish and austrian table tennis websites. To my surprise and the surprise of many french players who are using theses rubbers, they were removed from the list even though they had passed the minimum friction test at the beginning of 2008 in accordance with your criteria.

Even if I do not use any of the 2 newly banned rubbers, I am thinking about all the players that will be really really upset with this. They started their new season playing with either the Insider or SBIF, and after the ban of frictionless long pips, which compelled theme to get used to a new rubber and it took time for some of them, here's another ban on racket coverings that fit perfectly your minimum of friction.
To my opinion, there must be a clear explanation from the ITTF to tell players why such a decision was made.
Finally, did you think about the players who are using these rubbers and have now no other choice but to try to get used to another rubber before the next game, which will take place in 3 days. Did you ever think about players at all?

Thanks in advance for your prompt answer. The ITTF really needs to give a detailed explanation to its players because they deserve it!

Regards,
Gian-Pietro ANIELLO